New Dawn

New Dawn

Thursday, August 1, 2019

TripleTalalq Law in India - Monumental Blunder

                       
                        OPEN LETTER TO HON'BLE PM

Respected Sir

On 30th July 2019 your government (govt.) could finally muster numbers for passing THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON MARRIAGE) BILL, 2019 in Rajya Sabha and bill is now a law, hereinafter called TripleTalaq law, after the nod of Hon’ble President.  This is apparent that your govt. like others in the past used its brute force of majority in Lok Sabha and political maneuvering in Rajya Sabha to pass the bill in both houses without much deliberations. Despite data made available by NCRB over the years and still continue to point to gross misuse of existing gender-biased laws causing havoc in Indian society. Laws like IPC 498a, DV Act, 2005 are just couple of examples of gender-biased laws whose gross misuse has been pointed out by various courts of this country. Hon’ble Supreme Court went even step further to observe misuse as “Legal Terrorism”. When history would judge Triple Talaq law, gender-biased, it would not be about rights of Muslim women but its misuse.  

This goes without saying TripleTalaq law is an addition to the existing pile of gender-biased laws, would sit at the top actually, staring in the eyes of men of this country in the name of women’s rights. Not just the TripleTalaq law gender-biased but targets particular community which is much worse. After years of fight by sufferers against existing gender-biased laws various checks and balances were put in place which arrested indiscriminate arrests of husbands and their dear ones on mere allegations of wives. But still full reprieve from arrests is far cry as pointed by NCRB data.  With TripleTalaq law we are heading back to the era before 2014 when in-discriminatory arrests owing to gender-biased laws on mere allegations of wives were norm and shook the conscience of nation.  

A lot was debated in both houses w.r.t to bill corresponding to TripleTalaq law. Both sides debated the bill from the perspective of rights of women but no one highlighted prospective misuse based on official data available of misuse of other similar kind of gender-biased laws. This was a blunder of monumental proportion. TripleTalaq law not only reaffirms talaq-e-biddat (instant talaq) null and void by legislative action already confirmed by Hon’ble Supreme Court but goes a step further to criminalize instant talaq. A simple reading of TripleTalaq law indicates that all a disgruntled wife or anyone in her blood relation has to do is to walk into Police Station and state husband has pronounced instant talaq on wife allegedly. Sufficient to say not just instant talaq pronounced by words has been criminalized but through electronic means as well. Draconian provisions of the TripleTalaq law are summarized below:

  • Arrest of Husband.
  • Bail of Husband without hearing wife is not possible. 
  • Only compounding can get early relief to husband accused of    instant talaq.
  • In any case custody of children would be handed over to wife    plus monthly subsistence allowance.


Reading of above provisions would indicate criminal jurisprudence has been thrown out of the window. An alleged accused has a right to fair trail but if alleged accused cannot even get a bail without complainant being heard, which itself can be subjected to misuse by complainant for not being available on the date of bail, then getting justice can be forgotten too. Under the garb of TripleTalaq law other laws pertaining to custody of children and maintenance have been given skip too as wife would get subsistence allowance and custody of children without any consideration to merit.

In electronic form alleged instant talaq pronounced can be heavily misused and may result in conviction or total submission by husband because wife is expected to have access to electronic gadgets etc. of husband if living with husband

Just to summarize Tripletalaq law would become an extortion tool for disgruntled or adulterous wives or those needing just separation. It effectively, takes away right of a person to divorce by inculcating fear through criminal provision. Through this law much talked about fear of Muslim wife being given instant talaq has been transferred to husband which in no means can be called justice. This law is nothing but perfect revenge of a Muslim woman through State for practice which was medieval and not approved by Islam. Various Islamic countries have dealt with instant talaq in a much better way keeping it under the ambit of civil dispute. Laws of various Islamic countries must have been considered before drafting the bill which obviously was not paid heed to.

Your Hon’ble Law Minster’s defense of bill in Rajya Sabha was much shallow. To justify the bill he went through the history of law making and counted laws which made religious/societal practices null and void and criminalized them as well. Effectively, claiming that your govt. is well within right to do the same but wrong done in the past can never justify another wrong. Argument that legislature is there to legislate and courts to interpret doesn’t hold water either if data suggests that a specific category of laws has tendency to be misused historically. In that scenario, legislature is duty bound to take into consideration learning form past while drafting a law. 

Existing TripleTalaq law is recipe for disaster for a Muslim community and sets a wrong precedence by converting Divorce, a civil matter, into criminal matter which may in future become applicable for other communities too. Through this open letter it is requested  that a notification must be issued that checks and balances to stop misuse of law including but not limited to like Crime Against Women (CAW) cell process, mediation, CrPC 41a notice etc. kicks in immediately. In parallel laws of other Islamic countries to ensure rights of both the parties are secured without any prejudice must be studied and best provisions from those laws must be incorporated in TripleTalaq law. No doubt provisions of criminality, subsistence allowance and child custody from TripleTalaq law must be removed immediately. 

MRA Tikloo



Monday, July 8, 2019

Father's Love for Daughter

Dear R..o..

I miss you, a lot. You were just six (6) days old when you had to leave and I was a mute spectator. You are over an year now and growing fast. Privilege of being with you when you started walking, uttering words, recognizing loved ones and much more was snatched from me. But now as and when I see you walking in corridors from far away it is like a trained Kathak dancer walking. When I hear your screams echoing from far away they are like soothing music to my ears. You are a ray of hope in my life which gives me energy to take it to conclusion the way things are. Before you came in my life most of my friends had children above age 10 and I lost all hope of ever becoming a father. And then you came and  fulfilled so many of my dreams. You are my reflection baptized -R...o..- name I thought in my college days. I would always be your proud "Pappa" and it is as true a fact as existence of universe. 

The happenings of day you were born to next five (5) days you were with me are engraved in my memory forever and I can replay them anytime. Those six (6) days are as essential to me as rain to desert, sun to solar system and earth's magnetic waves to birds. I regularly go through photos and videos of you to stop my craving of kissing you on your cheeks, playing with you and showering you with my love. Technology is a saviour otherwise it would have been really tough without you. 

I often think of society we live in. A father's love for child is taken for granted. It is regularly pitched against mother's love and it looses more often than not. It is unwritten law a father is not made to raise children and his duties are restricted to only of protector and provider. I want to raise you and prove perception of society wrong, say proudly to my friends it is tough to raise a child, be awake whole night for you, stroll holding you in my arms and make milk for you when you cry communicating your hunger. But then often I think given the bias of society and system, I have already lost the battle of being with you and six (6) days I spent with you is a slice I would get from your life. 

In few days from now I have to prove my love for you. That would be the only way to be able to hold you in my arms. Though it is beyond my comprehension how can a sacred emotion like love be proven? I have a tsunami of emotions within me right now and I don't see any means to subside it. I don't know how am I going to complete the herculean task I have at my hands? But I only know whatever may be the outcome I would not leave a single stone unturned  to make my case of being a proud "Pappa" of yours.

O' my little sunshine, if you ever read this blog, my advise to you would be never make your case of progress on someone else's fall or misery. Live a life of dignity and be a law-abiding citizen. Stay independent but always respect elders. Above all learn to compromise but not at the cost of your self-respect. 

A proud "Pappa"








Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Schadenfreude

"Schadenfreude - pleasure derived by someone from another person's misfortune" would aptly describe what I felt as soon as I heard the news of current Chief Justice Of India (CJI) being a new victim of #MeToo. But when news started to sink in I realized what I felt was much more complex. 

It is well known #MeToo wrecked havoc in Indian Society. And when I thought it probably has lived its life, it is trying to rear its ugly head again. Several public figures were victims (apt word) of #MeToo. For example on whims and fancies of a female who wanted to settle old score an FIR U/S 376 (Rape) was lodged against a prominent personality in Bollywood. A cabinet minister, who is now fighting a battle in court to restore his dignity and respect in society, had to resign. There was no one in the System to listen to men who were victims of #MeToo. These men were asked to go through the judicial process and prove themselves innocent. Hence, would it not be apt now for CJI to go through the same judicial process to prove his innocence? But wait!!! he is CJI and should not he be like Caesar’s wife beyond any doubt? Tomorrow, as things stand even the First Citizen Of India can be a victim of #MeToo and nothing much can be done. Above, all I can imagine the feminist lobby screaming through its lungs to demand resignation and what not. After all #MeToo feeds itself on naming and shaming and taking away the precious jewel of a man “His Respect” and guess what there is no punishment if accuser is found to be having ulterior motive. 

My mind is in state of dichotomy. One part of it wants CJI should suffer same fate as millions of other innocent men facing false allegations. Same judiciary he is part of rarely stood for men victims of false allegations year after year. “Prima Facie” is often used in court rooms to make a man go through a trial, despite there is not a shred of evidence against  him, to defend his dignity and respect against the words of disgruntled wives/GFs/female co-workers. However, other part of it wants to support CJI without any second thought. As an MRA my “Dharma” is to trust a man and never judge him.  

Hence, I am going to shout out loud that I am in full support of CJI and firmly believe that this is a larger conspiracy to malign an imporant pillar of democracy - Judiciary.

But through this blog I would also want judiciary to introspect. As a society we are at cross road and before things get more worse and we head for a gender war, it is very important judiciary should take a lead and in conjunction with legislature and bureaucracy try to restore the balance in society.

First step in this regard would be to make all gender biased laws gender neutral. Alleged crimes which pushed formation of Gender Biased laws should have been treated like other crimes and there were enough measures available to deal with them. Gender Biased laws never achieved the balance what legislature intended them to achieve as it was imaginary and formation of laws was based on manufactured data. Once laws were formed there was no mechanism put in place to capture the effectiveness. In fact, even the manufactured data based on which laws were formed disappeared from public domain. However, one thing is for sure Gender Biased laws have certainly created a great divide between two important genders of society.

Second step would be that any piece of legislature must have a misuse clause to act as deterrent for false cases. Misuse clause should be so strong that a complainant must think 100 times before making a complaint. 

Third and final step would be to accept that men have emotions too, they can cry too, they can suffer from depression too because of turmoil in their matrimonial lives, they can be single parent too and much more. Once we accept the issues of men formation of Men's Commission would make sense. 

Post-Script: I am certain CJI would come out as a winner soon and that would be a dawn of new beginning. 



Tikloo (MRA)